[VIEWED 2498
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
xkavrepalanchok
Please log in to subscribe to xkavrepalanchok's postings.
Posted on 04-28-24 12:58
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13214823/Obama-liberal-Illinois-judge-illegal-migrants-guns.html
|
|
|
|
ShreeRaam
Please log in to subscribe to ShreeRaam's postings.
Posted on 04-28-24 2:09
PM [Snapshot: 56]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Judiciary is independent. Stop saying Obama or Trump judge. It’s not doing any good for the country. Stop politicizing judiciary.
|
|
|
logan
Please log in to subscribe to logan's postings.
Posted on 04-28-24 3:43
PM [Snapshot: 114]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Shreeramji, People create account in Sajha with full of agendas and we can not change either their mind nor behavior. Who they are , always are. I still remember my friend Jhaa's saying " गिदडकि खाल बदलि जा सकती लेकिन आदते कभी नही". By theory Judiciary should be independent in theory but in practice it is not 100% independent for example Supreme Court should act that fast on Roe v. Wade case.
|
|
|
Sexy In Sari
Please log in to subscribe to Sexy In Sari's postings.
Posted on 04-28-24 5:24
PM [Snapshot: 185]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
When CNN, WashingtonPost, New York Times, put headline like...Trump Judges bla bla...you guys are OK,,...
And When opposite party writes like that...it is full of agenda..lol...
|
|
|
ShreeRaam
Please log in to subscribe to ShreeRaam's postings.
Posted on 04-29-24 9:28
AM [Snapshot: 321]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I never said Trump Judge or never supported any news outlets politicizing Judiciary. It's just your assumption. Anyway that judge basically ruled in favor of second amendment. What's the issue?
|
|
|
tps8249
Please log in to subscribe to tps8249's postings.
Posted on 04-29-24 2:49
PM [Snapshot: 406]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
the people have right to bear arms
“The law was part of a wave of laws that were passed in the late 1960s regulating guns, especially to target African-Americans,” says Adam Winkler, author of Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms. “Including the Gun Control Act of 1968, which adopted new laws prohibiting certain people from owning guns, providing for beefed up licensing and inspections of gun dealers and restricting the importation of cheap Saturday night specials [pocket pistols] that were popular in some urban communities.” In contrast to the NRA’s rigid opposition to gun control in today’s America, the organization fought alongside the government for stricter gun regulations in the 1960s. This was part of an effort to keep guns out of the hands of African-Americans as racial tensions in the nation grew. The NRA felt especially threatened by the Black Panthers
Last edited: 29-Apr-24 03:27 PM
|
|
|