What y'll thing about it?

wat u talking about... aint got a clue here

Neo Nepal
This is a really confusing statement. Do you mean someone should first fall in love and lose him/her in order to live with a psychopathic person rest of his/her life ? What the heck...?

If someone would be so interested to live with psychopathic person why whould he/she go through the a long detour (hassle) of falling in love with someone else just to lose him/her ? Wouldnt it be an efficient, hasslefree and time saving thing to go straight to a psychopathic person to marry him/her ?

"G" and "K" keys are quite far from each other to make "THING" to "THINK"....

Sita-Ram......!!!!!!!

i think "than" is missing in the sentence.........

"THAN" or "THEN"??????????????

Only neo nepal has the answer..............

Yup, I am missing than in sentence..
I am referring to this sentence to my ex-girl friend. We have been lived together almost three years under one roof. However, things are getting tense everyday so I dumped her couple of days ago. She is very ambitious; she wants power, money, and respect in no time. In reality, it will take quite some time to fulfill her desire. Therefore, it is better to have loved and lost than to live with the psycho the rest of the life…what would you do on this situation??????????????????????????

It's no use staying in a relationship if you are not comfortable with where it is going. Life is too short and precious to waste it on something that makes you miserable.

My 2 cents.

:)

Let her fullfill her destiny. After all if she wants those stuffs she should get them. There is no reason why she should not get them. The thing comes down to simple question .

Does she want you to fullfill her destiny or does she want to fullfill her destiny by herself ?
If she wants you to fullfill her destiny then well it's an unreasonable demand.
If she wants to fullfill her destiny by herself then it is completely reasonable and no one can or should stop her.

By the way there are far more options available than just having loved, lost and deciding to live with a psychopathic person.
It is well possible to have loved, lost and fallen in love again (with someone else) to live this wonderful life. Just because you loved and lost doesnt mean you necessarily have to go live with some psychopathic person. There will always be someone else who will make you happy.

you did well... neo nepali... you don't want to wear shoes with holes... get another shoes... work out with flippers... or naked feet...

Ohh well... I loved and lost twice yet I still found a third person to fall into love that I feel happy to have. If it can work with me why shouldnt it work with you ?

khaobadi bro.. (O:
it would always work with you because its always about u and u would be able to "khao" with new one every time that's why it works hoina ta (O:

j/k.. pheri. .khaobadi bro ko fan haru aaulan malai khana (O:

=====================================================
as always
what do i knoe (O:

"Therefore, it is better to have loved and lost than to live with the psycho the rest of the life…"

LMAO. I needed this little piece of humor. Feeling kind of blue today :(.

IndisGuise:)

"she wants power, money, and respect"

neo_Nepal, all that "psycho" needed was a good f**k !

it is better to have love and lust....

I would prefer it other way round. How does lust and love sound? ;)

i suppose you could first have lust followed by love...wild passionate primate lust that slowly fades away, only to be replaced by undying love......but definitely, after lust, love is a must.....

Hypothetically, all other things being equal;

If you could have a choice, would you prefer wilder, more passionate, burning lust that never fades away,

OR,

Would you go for a mere, usual and mundane love:p after wild passionate primate lust.

This questrion is also open to others besides zalim. :)

well, option A definitely sounds more tempting....but humans have a tendency to get bored quickly...the initial excitement, which is partly caused by novelty, wears off over time....if you can sustain the same level of excitement forever, maybe it's better...

but option B is not bad either....as long as the love is a good substitute...for example. say you are like 85 yrs old...perhaps all you really care about is company and appreciation and affection, because even after a viagra-cialis cock-tail (no pun intended) one's willy is still free falling...,and lust is just a distant memory of the long lost glory days....so the short answer, is it really depends on the stage in life...for a horny teenager, the choice would be A...for a sterile senior citizen, choice B would be more tempting..

What about the one in between? What would a virile male who is in the prime of his exciting adult life do? What if he is neither a teenager, nor has reached anywheer close to being a senior citizen?

Assuming that we both are around the same age, WHAT ABOUT US? :D

Option A or B? Can we have our cake and eat it too? ;)


IndisGuise:)